Разделы 2.1, 2.2

1. Алиев, М.Д. Злокачественные опухоли костей // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2010. № 2. C. 3–8.
2. Capanna, R. What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections? / R. Capanna, G. Scoccianti, F. Frenos, A. Vilardi, G. Beltrami, D.A. Campanacci // Clin Orthop Relat Res. — 2015. No. 473. P. 820–830.
3. Pala, E. Survival of Modern Knee Tumor Megaprostheses: Failures, Functional Results, and a Comparative Statistical Analysis / E. Pala, G. Trovarelli, T. Calabro, A. Angelini, C.N. Abati, P. Ruggieri // Clin Orthop Relat Res. — 2015. — No. 473. — P. 891–899.
4. Benevenia, J. Outcomes of a modular intercalary endoprosthesis as treatment for segmental defects of the femur, tibia, and humerus / J. Benevenia, R. Kirchner, F. Patterson [et al.] // Clin Orthop Relat Res. — 2016. — No. 474. — P. 539–548.
5. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2021 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: ООО «КОМПАНИЯ ПОЛИГРАФМАСТЕР», 2021. С. 4–22.
6. Cancer Stat Facts: Bone and Joint Cancer // National Cancer Institute. — URL: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/bones.html.
7. Bone Cancer (Sarcoma of Bone): Statistics // Cancer.net. — URL: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/bone-cancer/statistics.
8. Rojas G.A., Hubbard A.K., Diessner B.J., Ribeiro K.B., Spector L.G. International trends in incidence of osteosarcoma (1988–2012). Int J Cancer. 2021 Sep 1;149(5):1044-1053. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33673. Epub 2021 May 17. PMID: 33963769; PMCID: PMC9137041.
9. Marcove, R.C. En bloc resection for osteogenic sarcoma / R.C. Marcove // Can J Surg. 1977. No. 20(6). P. 521–528.
10. Каприн, А.Д. Состояние онкологической помощи населению в 2022 г. / А.Д. Каприн, В.В. Старинский, А.О. Шахзадова // М.: ООО «КОМПАНИЯ ПОЛИГРАФМАСТЕР», 2023. С. 168–170.
11. Hernigou P. Bone transplantation and tissue engineering. Part II: Bone graft and osteogenesis in the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (Duhamel, Haller, Ollier and MacEwen). Int Orthop (SICOT) 2015;39:193–204.
12. Schmidt A.H. Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard? Injury. 2021 Jun; 52 Suppl 2:S18-S22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043. Epub 2021 Feb 3. PMID: 33563416.
13. Laurencin CT, El-Amin SF. Xenotransplantation in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(1):4–8.
14. Dutta SR, Passi D, Singh P, Bhuibhar A. Ceramic and nonceramic hydroxyapatite as a bone graft material: A brief review. Ir J Med Sci. 2015;184(1):101-106.
15. Herrick J. Siegel, MD; Robert C. Baird III, MD; Justin Hall, BA; Robert Lopez-Ben, MD; Philip H. Lander, MD. The Outcome of Composite Bone Graft Substitute Used to Treat Cavitary Bone Defects. Orthopedics. 2008;31(8).
16. Clark J. Chen and Earl W. Brien. Early postoperative complications of bone filling in curettage defects. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019;14:261.
17. Colding-Rasmussen T, Horstmann P.F., Jørgensen P.H., Hettwer W., Hansen B.H., Tierp-Wong C.N.E., Petersen M.M. Does the use of polymethyl-methacrylate cement after intralesional curettage of giant cell tumors of appendicular bone guarantee reduced local recurrence rates? A retrospective analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2023 Sep-Dec;31(3):10225536231202155. doi: 10.1177/10225536231202155. PMID: 37688488.
18. Агаев, Д.К. Пятилетний опыт использования фосфат-кальциевых биокомпозитных материалов для реконструкции костных дефектов при атипических хрящевых опухолях / Агаев Д.К., Соколовский А.В., Булычева И.В., Федорова А.В., Соколовский В.А., Бадыров Р.Н. // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2019. № 4. С. 36–46.
19. Hwang, J.S. From amputation to limb salvage reconstruction: evolution and role of the endoprosthesis in musculoskeletal oncology / J.S. Hwang, A.D. Mehta, R.S. Yoon, K.S. Beeb // J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2014.No. 15. P. 81–86.
20. Bădilă A.E., Rădulescu D.M., Niculescu A.G., Grumezescu A.M., Rădulescu M., Rădulescu A.R. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Bone Metastases and Primary Bone Tumors: An Up-to-Date Review. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 23;13(16):4229. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164229. PMID: 34439383; PMCID: PMC8392383.
21. Simon, M.A. Limb-salvage treatment versus amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur / M.A. Simon, M.A. Aschiliman, N. Thomas, H.J. Mankin // J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986. No. 68. P. 1331–1337.
22. Трапезников, Н.Н. Процесс и перспективы развития методов лечения сарком костей / Н.Н. Трапезников, М.Д. Алиев, Ю.Н. Соловьев, П.А. Синюков, В.А. Соколовский, С.Д. Щербаков, В.В. Тепляков // Российский онкологический журнал. 1999. No.3. C. 21–25.
23. Zając A., Kopeć S., Szostakowski B., Spałek M., Fiedorowicz M., Bylina E., Filipowicz P., Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A., Tysarowski A., Czarnecka A., et al. Chondrosarcoma-from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies. Cancers. 2021;13:2390. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102390.
24. Errani, C. Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review / C. Errani, A.F. Mavrogenis, L. Cevolani, S. Spinelli, A. Piccioli, G. Maccauro, N. Baldini, D. Donati // Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017. No. 27. P. 205–211 [DOI 10.1007/s00590-016-1857-9].
25. Ruggieri, P. Protocol of surgical treatment of long bone pathological fractures / P. Ruggieri, A.F. Mavrogenis, R. Casadei, C. Errani, A. Angelini, T. Calabro, E. Pala, M. Mercuri // Injury. 2010. No. 41(11). P. 1161–1167.
26. Henrichs, M.P. Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction / M.-P. Henrichs, J. Krebs, G. Gosheger, A. Streitbuerger, M. Nottrott, T. Sauer, S. Hoell, G. Singh, J. Hardes // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014. No. 12. P. 330 [doi:10.1186/1477-7819-12-330].
27. Harvey, N. Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases / N. Harvey, E.R. Ahlmann, D.C. Allison, L. Wang, L.R. Menendez // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. No. 470. P. 684–686.
28. Ratasvuori, M. Prognostic role of en-bloc resection and late onset of bone metastasis in patients with bone-seeking carcinomas of the kidney, breast, lung, and prostate: SSG study on 672 operated skeletal metastases / M. Ratasvuori, R. Wedin, B.H. Hansen, J. Keller, C. Trovik, O. Zaikova [et al.] // J Surg Oncol. 2014. No. 110. P. 360–365.
29. Соколовский, А.В. Сравнение и достоверность прогностических систем у пациентов с поражением позвоночника множественной миеломой и плазмоцитомой / А.В. Соколовский, О.М. Вотякова, А.П. Николаев, Э.Р. Мусаев // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2013. № 1. C. 11–14.
30. Борзов, К.А. Выбор тактики хирургического лечения пациентов с метастазами рака почки в позвоночнике / К.А. Борзов, А.К. Валиев, Э.Р. Мусаев, А.В. Кулага // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2018. № 2. C. 14–28.
31. Мусаев, Э.Р. Шкала оценки прогноза при метастазах рака молочной железы в позвоночник / Э.Р. Мусаев, А.М. Степанова, С.Л. Гуторов, В.В. Бурляев, М.Д. Алиев // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2016. № 2. С. 27–31.
32. Алиев, М.Д. Эндопротезирование как основа онкоортопедии / М.Д. Алиев // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2010. № 4. С. 7–12.
33. Wilkins, R.M. The Phenix expandable prosthesis: early american experience / R.M. Wilkins, A. Soubeiran // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001. No. 382. P. 51–58.
34. Jacofsky, D.J. Fundamentals of revision knee arthroplasty / D.J. Jacofsky, A.K. Hedley // Slack Incorporated. 2012. Nov 1. P. 57–96.
35. Williams, P.A. Polyethelene wear debrides produced in knee simulator odel: effect of crosslinking and counterface material / P.A. Williams, C.M. Brown, R. Tsukamoto, I.C. Clarke // J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010. Vol. 92. No. 1. P. 538–588.
36. Sonntag, R. What’s next? Alternative materials for articulation in total joint replacement / R. Sonntag, J. Reinders, J.P. Kretzer // Acta Biomaterialia. 2012. No. 8. P. 2434–2441.
37. Myers, G.J.C. The long-term results of endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for bone tumours / G.J.C. Myers, A.T. Abudu, S.R. Carter, R.M. Tillman, R.J. Grimer // J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2007. Vol. 89-B. No. 12.P. 1632–1637.
38. Myers, G.J.C. Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur for bone tumours / G.J.C. Myers, A.T. Abudu, S.R. Carter, R.M. Tillman, R.J. Grimer // J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. — 2007.  Vol. 89-B. No. 4.P. 521–526.
39. Henderson, E.R. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review / E.R. Henderson, J.S. Groundland, E. Pala, J.A. Dennis, R. Wooten, D. Cheong [et al.] // J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011. Mar 2. No. 93(5). P. 418–429.
40. Morii, T. Deep infection in tumor endoprosthesis around the knee: a multi-institutional study by the Japanese musculoskeletal oncology group / T. Morii, H. Morioka, T. Ueda, N. Araki, N. Hashimoto, A. Kawai [et al.] // BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013. Jan 31.No. 14. P. 51 [doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-51].
41. Sevelda, F. Total Femur Replacement After Tumor Resection: Limb Salvage / F. Sevelda, R. Schuh, J.G. Hofstaetter, M. Schinhan, R. Windhager, P.T. Funovics // Usually Achieved But Complications and Failures are Common. 2015.Jun. Vol. 473. No. 6.P. 2079–2087.
42. Mavrogenis, A.F. Proximal tibial resections and reconstructions: clinical outcome of 225 patients / A.F. Mavrogenis, E. Pala, A. Angelini, A. Ferraro, P. Ruggieri // J Surg Oncol.2013. No. 107(4). P. 335–342.
43. Pala, E. Survival of current production tumor endoprostheses: Complications, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis / E. Pala, E.R. Henderson, T. Calabro, A. Angelini, C.N. Abati, G. Trovarelli [et al.] // J Surg Oncol. 2013. No. 108(6). P. 403–408.
44. Бадыров, Р.Н. Отдаленные результаты первичного и ревизионного эндопротезирования диафизарного сегмента кости. Опыт 23 лет / Р.Н. Бадыров, А.В. Соколовский, В.А. Соколовский, М.Д. Алиев // Cаркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2018. № 3. С. 36–42.
45. Gori, M. Modular Endoprostheses for Nonneoplastic Conditions: Midterm Complications and Survival / M. Gori, G. Scoccianti, F. Frenos, L. Bettini, F. Familiari, G. Gasparini, G. Beltrami, P. Cuomo, P. De Biase, R. Capanna // Biomed Res Int. 2016. P. 1–5 [doi: 10.1155/2016/2606521. Epub 2016 Dec 5. PubMed PMID: 28050552; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5165145].
46. Chandrasekar, C.R. Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur / C.R. Chandrasekar, R.J. Grimer, S.R. Carter, R.M. Tillman, A.T. Abudu // J Orthop Surg Res. 2008.Nov 4. No. 3. P. 50 [doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-50. PubMed PMID: 18983677; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2614964].
47. Menendez, L.R. Endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplasms of the proximal femur / L.R. Menendez, E.R. Ahlmann, C. Kermani, H. Gotha // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006. No. 450.P. 46–51.
           48. Cannon, C.P. Functional outcome following endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus / C.P. Cannon, G.U. Paraliticci, P.P. Lin, V.O. Lewis, A.W. Yasko // J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009. No. 18.P. 705–710.
49. Potter, B.K. Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors / B.K. Potter, S.C. Adams, J.D. Pitcher, T.I. Malinin, H.T. Temple // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. No. 467.P. 1035–1041.
50. Houdek, M. Functional and oncologic outcome of cemented endoprosthesis for malignant proximal femoral tumors: Proximal Femoral Endoprosthesis / M. Houdek, C. Watts, C.S. Wyles, P. Rose, M. Taunton, F.H. Sim // Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016. Sep.No. 114(4). P. 501–506 [doi: 10.1002/jso.24339. Epub 2016 Jun 28].
51. Stevenson, J.D. Hemiarthroplasty proximal femoral endoprostheses following tumour reconstruction / J.D. Stevenson, V.S. Kumar, G.L. Cribb, P. Cool // The Bone & Joint Journal. 2018. No. 100-B.P.101–108.
52. Henderson, E.R. The stability of the hip after the use of a proximal femoral endoprosthesis for oncological indications: analysis of variables relating to the patient and the surgical technique / E.R. Henderson, B.J. Keeney, E. Pala, P.T. Funovics, W.C. Eward, J.S. Groundland, L.K. Ehrlichman, S.S. Puchner, B.E. Brigman, J.E. Ready, H.T. Temple, P. Ruggieri, R. Windhager, G.D. Letson, F.J. Hornicek // Bone Joint J. Vol. 99-B. No. 4.P. 531–537.
53. Tang, X. Synthetic mesh improves shoulder function after intraarticular resection and prosthetic replacement of proximal humerus / X. Tang, W. Guo, R. Yang, S. Tang, T. Ji // Clin Orthop Relat Res.2015. Apr. No. 473(4).P. 1464–1471.
54. Schmolders, J. Silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in case of tumour-is there an increased risk of periprosthetic infection by using a trevira tube? / J. Schmolders, S. Koob, P. Schepers, M. Kehrer, S.P. Frey, D.C. Wirtz, P.H. Pennekamp, A.C. Strauss // Int Orthop. 2017. Feb.No. 41(2). P. 423–428.
55. Соколовский, А.В. Долгосрочные результаты и современные принципы профилактики и лечения пациентов с асептической нестабильностью эндопротеза в онкологии / А.В. Соколовский, В.А. Соколовский, А.Б. Блудов, А.В. Федорова, Д.К. Агаев, А.К. Валиев // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2022. № 1. С. 11–24.
56. Fujibuchi, T. New endoprosthesis suspension method with polypropylene monofilament knitted mesh after resection of bone tumors in proximal humerus / T. Fujibuchi, S. Matsumoto, T. Shimoji, K. Ae, T. Tanizawa, T. Gokita, K. Hayakawa [et al.] // Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2015.Jun. Vol. 24(6). P. 882–888 [doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Dec 26].
57. Friesenbichler, J. Evaluation of stability of rotating hinge knee prostheses: a biomechanical study / J. Friesenbichler, A. Leithner, M. Glehr, P. Sadoghi, W. Maurer-Ertl, A. Avian, R. Windhager // ISRN Orthopedics. 2013. Jun.P. 42–46.
58. Gosheger, G. Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in 250 Patients with Sarcoma / G. Gosheger, G. Carsten, H. Ahrens, A. Streitbuerger, W. Winkelmann, J. Hardes // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006.No. 450. P. 164–171.
59. Albergo, J.I. Proximal Tibia Reconstruction After Bone Tumor Resection: Are Survivorship and Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement and Osteoarticular Allograft Similar? / J.I. Albergo, C.L. Gaston, L.A. Aponte-Tinao, M.A. Ayerza, D.L. Muscolo, G.L. Farfalli, L.M. Jeys, S.R. Carter, R.M. Tillman, A.T. Abudu, R.J. Grimer // Clin Orthop Relat Res.2017. Mar. No. 475(3).P. 676–682 [doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4843-y. PubMed PMID: 27103142; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5289179].
60. Puchner, S.E. Outcome after Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia — Complications and Competing Risk Analysis / S.E. Puchner, P. Kutscha-Lissberg, A. Kaider, J. Panotopoulos, R. Puchner, C. Böhler, G. Hobusch, R. Windhager, P.T. Funovics // PLoS One. 2015. Aug. 13. No. 10(8). P. e0135736 [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135736. PubMed PMID: 26270336; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4535855].
61. Bus, M.P.A. What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS1 Modular Endoprostheses for Reconstruction of Tumor Resection of the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia? / M.P.A. Bus, M.A.J. van de Sande, M. Fiocco, G.R. Schaap, J.A.M. Bramer, P.D.S. Dijkstra // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017.No. 475. P. 708–718.
62. Wu, C.C. Implant design and resection length affect cemented endoprosthesis survival in proximal tibial reconstruction / C.C. Wu, R.M. Henshaw, T. Pritsch, H. Squires, M.M. Malawer // J Arthroplasty. 2008.No. 23. P. 886–893.
63. Liu, T. Medial head gastrocnemius muscle flap in the limb-salvage operation for proximal tibial osteosarcoma / T. Liu, Q. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Shen, X. Guo, L. Ling // Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012.Dec. No. 37(12). P. 1250–1254.
64. Coathup, M.J. Long-term survival of cemented distal femoral endoprostheses with a hydroxyapatite-coated collar: a histological study and a radiographic follow-up / M.J. Coathup, V. Batta, R.C. Pollock, W.J. Aston, S.R. Cannon, J.A. Skinner, T.W.R. Briggs, P.S. Unwin, G.W. Blunn // Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. Vol. 95.P. 1569–1575.
65. Grimer, R.J. Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement for malignant tumours of bone / R.J. Grimer, B.K. Aydin, H. Wafa, S.R. Carter, L. Jeys, A. Abudu, M. Parry // Bone Joint J. 2016.No. 98-B. P. 857–864.
66. Kostuj, T. Midterm Outcome after Mega-Prosthesis Implanted in Patients with Bony Defects in Cases of Revision Compared to Patients with Malignant Tumors / T. Kostuj, M.H. Baums, K. Schaper, A. Meurer // The Journal of Arthroplasty.Vol. 30. Iss. 9. P. 1592–1596.
67. Thambapillary, S. Implant Longevity, Complications and Functional Outcome Following Proximal Femoral Arthroplasty for Musculoskeletal Tumors A Systematic Review / S. Thambapillary, R. Dimitriou, K.G. Makridis, E.M. Fragkakis, P. Bobak, P.V. Giannoudis // The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013.No. 28. P. 1381–1385.
68. Late Complications and Survival of Endoprosthetic Reconstruction after Resection of Bone Tumors / A. Shehadeh, J. Noveau, M. Malawer, R. Henshaw // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. No. 468.P. 2885–2895.
69. Janssen, S.J. Outcome after reconstruction of proximal femoral tumors: A systematic review / S.J. Janssen, D.W.G. Langerhuizen, J.H. Schwab, J.A.M. Bramer // J Surg Oncol. 2019. No. 119.P. 120–129.
70. Schwartz, A.J. Cemented Distal Femoral Endoprostheses for Musculoskeletal Tumor / A.J. Schwartz, J.M. Kabo, F.C. Eilber, F.R. Eilber, J.J. Eckardt // Clin Orthop Relat Res.2010. No. 468. P. 2198–2210.
71. Jeys, L. The long-term risks of infection and amputation with limb salvage surgery using endoprostheses / L. Jeys, R. Grimer // Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009. No. 179.P. 75–84.
72. Wang, В. Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus after tumour resection with polypropylene mesh / В. Wang, Q. Wu, J. Liu, S. Yang, Z. Shao // International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2015. No. 39.P. 501–506.
73. Holl, S. Distal femur and proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis in revision knee arthroplasty: a limb-saving procedure / S. Holl, A. Schlomberg, G. Gosheger, R. Dieckmann, A. Streitbuerger, D. Schulz, J. Hardes // Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. No. 20. P. 2513–2518.
74. Соколовский А.В. Отдаленные результаты профилактики и лечения
перипротезной инфекции в онкоортопедии / Соколовский А.В., Соколовский В.А., Мачак Г.Н., Петухова И.Н. Курильчик А.А., Жеравин А.А. // Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова 2023. № 2. С. 143–159.
75. Finstein, J.L. Bipolar Proximal Femoral Replacement Prostheses for Musculoskeletal Neoplasms / J.L. Finstein, J.J. King, E.J. Fox, C.M. Ogilvie, R.D. Lackman // Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2007. No. 459.P. 66–75.
76. Allison, D.C. Peri-Prosthetic Infection in the Orthopedic Tumor Patient / D.C. Allison, E. Huang, E.R. Ahlmann, S. Carney, L. Wang, L.R. Menendez // JISRF Reconstructive Review. 2014. Sep.Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 13–17.
77. Sigmund, I.K. Efficacy of different revision procedures for infected megaprostheses in musculoskeletal tumour surgery of the lower limb / I.K. Sigmund, J. Gamper, C. Weber, J. Holinka, J. Panotopoulos, P.T. Funovics, R. Windhager // PLoS One. 2018. Jul 5.No. 13(7). P. e0200304 [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200304. PMID: 29975769; PMCID: PMC6033467].
78. Дмитриева, Н.В. Послеоперационные инфекционные осложнения / Н.В. Дмитриева, И.Н. Петухова. М.: Практическая медицина, 2013. С. 113–135.
79. Алиев, М.Д. Осложнения при эндопротезировании больных с опухолями костей / М.Д. Алиев, В.А. Соколовский, Н.В. Дмитриева // Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН. 2003. Вып. 2 (доп. 1).С. 35–39.
80. Zajonz, D. Periprosthetic joint infections in modular endoprostheses of the lower extremities: a retrospective observational study in 101 patients / D. Zajonz, T. Prietzel, M. Moche // Patient safety in surgery. 2016.Feb. Vol. 10(6). [doi:10.1186/s13037-016-0095-8].
81. Misaghi, A. Osteosarcoma: a comprehensive review / A. Misaghi, A. Goldin, M. Awad, A.A. Kulidjian // SICOT J.2018. No. 4. P. 12 [doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017028. Epub 2018 Apr 9. PMID: 29629690; PMCID: PMC5890448].
82. Алиев, М.Д. Хондросаркома кости / М.Д. Алиев, Ю.Н. Соловьев, Т.К. Харатишвили, Э.Р. Мусаев, В.А. Соколовский. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2006. С. 11–55.
83. Соколовский, А.В. Отдаленные онкологические результаты лечения пациентов с первичными и метастатическими опухолями опорно-двигательного аппарата, перенесших эндопротезирование / В.А. Соколовский, А.В. Соколовский, А.А. Тарарыкова, А.В. Федорова, А.Б. Блудов // Саркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2022. № 4. С. 33–44.
84. Bacci, G. Local recurrence and local control of non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities: a 27-year experience in a single institution / G. Bacci, C. Forni, A. Longhi, S. Ferrari, M. Mercuri, F. Bertoni, M. Serra, A. Briccoli, A. Balladelli, P. Picci // J Surg Oncol. 2007.No. 96. P. 118–123.
85. Brosjo, O. Surgical procedure and local recurrence in 223 patients treated 1982–1997 according to two osteosarcoma chemotherapy protocols: the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience / O. Brosjo // Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1999. No. 285.P. 58–61.
86. Nathan, S.S. Treatment algorithm for locally recurrent osteosarcoma based on local disease-free interval and the presence of lung metastasis // S.S. Nathan, R. Gorlick, S. Bukata, A. Chou, C.D. Morris, P.J. Boland, A.G. Huvos, P.A. Meyers, J.H. Healey // Cancer.2006. No. 107. P. 1607–1616 [doi: 10.1002/cncr.22197].
87. Rodriguez-Galindo, C. Outcome after local recurrence of osteosarcoma: the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital experience (1970–2000) / C. Rodriguez-Galindo, N. Shah, M.B. McCarville, C.A. Billups, M.N. Neel, B.N. Rao, N.C. Daw // Cancer. 2004. No. 100.P. 1928–1935.
88. Weeden, S. The effect of local recurrence on survival in resected osteosarcoma / S. Weeden, R.J. Grimer, S.R. Cannon, A.H. Taminiau, B.M. Uscinska; European Osteosarcoma Intergroup // Eur J Cancer. 2001.No. 37. P. 39–46.
89. Takeuchi, A. What are the factors that affect survival and reapse after local recurrence of osteosarcoma? / A. Takeuchi, V.O. Lewis, R.L. Satcher, B.S. Moon, P.P. Lin // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014.Oct. No. 472(10). P. 3188–3195 [doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3759-7. Epub 2014 Jul 1].
90. Zhang, C. Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee / C. Zhang, J. Hu, K. Zhu [et al.] // International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2018. No. 42. P. 927 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3770-9].
91. Кушлинский, Н.Е. Длинные некодирующие РНК как конкурентные эндогенные РНК при остеосаркоме / Н.Е. Кушлинский, М.В. Фридман, Э.А. Брага // Молекулярная биология. 2020. Т. 54, № 5. С. 776–801.
92. Lachiewicz, P.F. Femoral Head Size and Wear of Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at 5 to 8 Years / P.F. Lachiewicz, D.S. Heckman, E.S. Soileau, J. Mangla, J.M. Martell // Clin Orthop Relat Res.2009. No. 467. P. 3290–3296.
93. Ruggieri, P. Local recurrence, survival and function after total femur resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction for bone sarcomas / P. Ruggieri, G. Bosco, E. Pala, C. Errani, M. Mercuri // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010.Nov. No. 468(11). P. 2860–2866.
94. Du, Z. Use of an artificial ligament decreases hip dislocation and improves limb function after total femoral prosthetic replacement following femoral tumor resection / Z. Du, S. Tang, R. Yang, X. Tang, T. Ji, W. Guo // J Arthroplasty. 2018. No. 33.P. 1507–1514.
95. Jacofsky, D.J. Fundamentals of revision hip arthroplasty / D.J. Jacofsky, A.K. Hedley. Slack Incorporated, 2012. P. 35–65.
96. Patil, S. Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation / S. Patil, A. Bergula, P.C. Chen, C.W. Colwell Jr, D.D. D'Lima // J Bone Joint Surg Am.2003. Vol. 85-A. Suppl. 4.P. 56–63.
97. Berry, D.J. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty / D.J. Berry, M. von Knoch, C.D. Schleck, W.S. Harmsen // J Bone Joint Surg Am.2005. Nov. No. 87(11).P. 2456–2463.
98. Kelley, S.S. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation / S.S. Kelley, P.F. Lachiewicz, J.M. Hickman, S.M. Paterno // Clin Orthop Relat Res.1998. Oct. No. 355.P. 163–170.
99. Windisch, С. Osteodensitometry measurements of periprosthetic bone using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry following total knee arthroplasty / С. Windisch, B. Windisch, W. Kolb, K. Kolb, P. Grutzner, A. Roth // Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012. No. 132.P. 1595–1601.
100. Soininvaara, T.A. Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients / T.A. Soininvaara, H.J. Miettinen, J.S. Jurvelin, O.T. Suomalainen, E.M. Alhava, H.P. Kroger // Acta Orthop Scand.2004. No. 75. P. 600–605.
101. Bitar, D. Biological response to prosthetic debris / D. Bitar, J. Parvizi // World J Orthop. 2015. No. 6(2). P. 172-189 [http://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i2/172.htm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.172].
102. Ollivere, B. Current concepts in osteolysis / B. Ollivere, J.A. Wimhurst, I.M. Clark, S.T. Donell // J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012.No. 94. P. 10–15 [PMID: 22219240 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.28047].
103. Tuan, R.S. What are the local and systemic biologic reactions and mediators to wear debris, and what host factors determine or modulate the biologic response to wear particles? / R.S. Tuan, F.Y. Lee, T.Y. Konttinen, J.M. Wilkinson, R.L. Smith // J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008.No. 16. Suppl. 1. S. 42–48 [PMID: 18612013].
104. Potnis, P.A. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathway mediates proinflammatory immune response to cobaltalloy particles / P.A. Potnis, D.K. Dutta, S.C. Wood // Cell Immunol.2013. No. 282. P. 53–65 [PMID: 23680697. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.04.003].
105. Keeney, M. Mutant MCP-1 protein delivery from layer-by-layer coatings on orthopedic implants to modulate inflammatory response / M. Keeney, H. Waters, K. Barcay, X. Jiang, Z. Yao, J. Pajarinen, K. Egashira, S.B. Goodman, F. Yang // Biomaterials.2013. No. 34. P. 10287–10295 [PMID: 24075408 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.028].
106. Jacobs, J.J. How has the biologic reaction to wear particles changed with newer bearing surfaces? / J.J. Jacobs, P.A. Campbell, T.Y. Konttinen // J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008. No. 16.Suppl. 1. S. 49–55 [PMID: 18612014].
107. Goodman, S.B. The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis / S.B. Goodman, E. Gibon, Z. Yao // Instr Course Lect.2013. No. 62. P. 201–206 [PMID: 23395025].
108. Hallab, N.J. Biologic effects of implant debris / N.J. Hallab, J.J. Jacobs // Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis.2009. No. 67. P. 182–188 [PMID: 19583551].
109. Jiang, Y. Effects of Ti, PMMA, UHMWPE, and Co-Cr wear particles on differentiation and functions of bone marrow stromal cells / Y. Jiang, T. Jia, W. Gong, P.H. Wooley, S.Y. Yang // J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013.No. 101. P. 2817–2825 [PMID: 24039045].
110. Bayley, N. What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metalon-metal THA? / N. Bayley, H. Khan, P. Grosso, T. Hupel, D. Stevens, M. Snider, E. Schemitsch, P. Kuzyk // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. No. 473.P. 477–484 [PMID: 25085361 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3824-2].
111. Tower, S.S. Arthroprosthetic cobaltism: neurological and cardiac manifestations in two patients with metal-on-metal arthroplasty: a case report / S.S. Tower // J Bone Joint Surg Am.2010.  No. 92. P. 2847–2851.
112. Visuri, T. A retrospective comparative study of mortality and causes of death among patients with metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip prostheses in primary osteoarthritis after a long-term follow-up / T. Visuri, H. Borg, P. Pulkkinen, P. Paavolainen, E. Pukkala // BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010. No. 11.P. 78.
113. Kinkel, S. Influence of stem design on the primary stability of megaprostheses of the proximal femur / S. Kinkel, J.D. Graage, J.P. Kretzer, E. Jakubowitz, J. Nadorf // International orthopaedics. 2013.No. 37(10). P. 1877–1883 [doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2052-9].
114. Nadorf, J. Influence of implant length and bone defect situation on primary stability after distal femoral replacement in vitro / J. Nadorf, S. Klein, S. Gantz, E. Jakubowitz, J. Kretzer, O. Bischel // The Knee. 2017.Oct. No. 24(5). P. 1016–1024 [doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Aug 6].
115. Kutzner, I. Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects / I. Kutzner, B. Heinlein, F. Graichen, A. Bender, A. Rohlmann, A. Halder, et al. // J Biomech. 2010. No. 43.P. 2164–2173.
116. Natarajan, M.V. Distal femoral tumours treated by resection and custom mega-prosthetic replacement / M.V. Natarajan, A. Sivaseelam, S. Ayyappan, J.C. Bose, M.S. Kumar // Int Orthop.2005. No. 29. P. 309–313.
117. Hardes, J. Tumour endoprosthesis replacement in the proximal tibia after intra-articular knee resection in patients with sarcoma and recurrent giant cell tumour / J. Hardes, M.-P. Henrichs, G. Gosheger, W. Guder, M. Nottrott, D. Andreou, E. Bormann, M. Eveslage, G. Hauschild, A. Streitbuerger // International Orthopaedics. Vol. 42(10). P. 2475–2481 [doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3893-z].
118. Okita, Y. Compensation by nonoperated joints in the lower limbs during walking after endoprosthetic knee replacement following bone tumor resection / Y. Okita, N. Tatematsu, K. Nagai [et al.] // Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013. No. 28.P. 898–903 [https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.clinbiomech.2013.08.005].
119. Carty, C.P. Assessment of kinematic and kinetic patterns following limb salvage procedures for bone sarcoma / C.P. Carty, M.B. Bennett, I.C. Dickinson, P. Steadman // Gait Posture.2009. No. 30. P. 547–551.
120. Rompen, J.C. Gait and function in patients with a femoral endoprosthesis after tumor resection: 18 patients evaluated 12 years after surgery / J.C. Rompen, S.J. Ham, J.P. Halbertsma, J.R. van Horn // Acta Orthop. Scand. 2002. No. 73.P. 439–446.
121. Bruns, J. Gait analysis in tumor patients after distal femoral resection and implantation of a megaprosthesis / J. Bruns, K. Raabe, G. Deuretzbacher // Acta Orthop Belg.2016. No. 82. P. 287–297.
122. Benedetti, M.G. Muscle performance about the knee joint in patients who had distal femoral replacement after resection of a bone tumor. An objective study with use of gait analysis / M.G. Benedetti, F. Catani, D. Donati, L. Simoncini, S. Giannini // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2000.No. 82-A. P. 1619–1625.
123. Pesenti, S. Knee function after limb salvage surgery for malignant bone tumor: comparison of megaprosthesis and distal femur allograft with epiphysis sparing / S. Pesenti, E. Peltier, V. Pomero, G. Authier, L. Roscigni, E. Viehweger, J.-L. Jouve // International Orthopaedics. 2018.Feb. No. 42(2). P. 427–436. [doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3608-x].
124. Kawai, A. Gait characteristics of patients after proximal femoral replacement for malignant bone tumour / A. Kawai, S.I. Backus, J.C. Otis, H. Inoue, J.H. Healey // J Bone Joint Surg [Br].2000. No. 82-B. P. 666–669.
125. Jones, K.B. Patient-oriented functional results of total femoral endoprosthetic reconstruction following oncologic resection / K.B. Jones, A.M. Griffin, C.R. Chandrasekar, D. Biau, A. Babinet, B. Deheshi, R.S. Bell, R.J. Grimer, J.S. Wunder, P.C. Ferguson // J Surg Oncol. 2011.No. 104. P. 561–565 [doi: 10.1002/jso.22003].
126. Ahmed, A.R. Total femur replacement / A.R. Ahmed // Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010. No. 130.P. 171–176 [doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0945-2].
127. Natarajan, M.V. Endoprosthetic reconstruction using total femoral custom megaprosthesis in malignant bone tumours / M.V. Natarajan, N. Balasubramanian, V. Jayasankar, M. Sameer // Int Orthop. 2009.No. 33. P. 1359–1363 [doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0737-x].
128. Ruggieri, P. Local recurrence, survival and function after total femur resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction for bone sarcomas / P. Ruggieri, G. Bosco, E. Pala, C. Errani, M. Mercuri // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010.No. 468. P. 2860–2866 [doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1476-4].
129. Gorter, J. The push-through total femoral prosthesis offers a functional alternative to total femoral replacement: a case series / J. Gorter, J.J.W. Ploegmakers, B.L.E.F. ten Have, H.W.B. Schreuder, P.C. Jutte // International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2017. No. 41. P. 2237–2244 [DOI 10.1007/s00264-017-3467-5].
130. Соколовский, А.В. Первый опыт диафизсохраняющего тотального эндопротезирования бедренной кости. Клинический случай / А.В. Соколовский, В.А. Соколовский, Р.Н. Бадыров, М.Д. Алиев // Cаркомы костей, мягких тканей и опухоли кожи. 2017. № 3. С. 43–49.
131. Böhler, C. Surgical and Functional Outcome after Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Patients with Osteosarcoma of the Humerus / C. Böhler, S. Brönimann, A. Kaider, S.E. Puchner, I.K. Sigmund, R. Windhager, P.T. Funovics // Scientific Reports.2018. No. 8(1). P. 1–7 [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34397-5].
132. Dubina, A. What is the Optimal Reconstruction Option after the Resection of Proximal Humeral Tumors? A Systematic Review / A. Dubina, B. Shiu, M. Gilotra, S.A. Hasan, D. Lerman, V.Y. Ng // The Open Orthopaedics Journal. 2017. No. 11(1).P. 203–211 [doi: 10.2174/1874325001711010203].
133. Farshad, M. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication / M. Farshad, C. Gerber // Int Orthop. 2010.No. 34(8). P. 1075–1082 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1125-2. PMID: 20865260].
134. Lang, N.W. What sports activity levels are achieved in patients with modular tumor endoprostheses of osteosarcoma about the knee? / N.W. Lang, G.M. Hobusch, P.T. Funovics, R. Windhager, J.G. Hofstaetter // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. Mar.No. 473(3). P. 847–854 [doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3788-2].